Submission from Landowner Member

LOWER COURTS NOT COMPETENT TO HEAR CROWN PATENT AGRUMENT

An injustice was done again, in the lower courts on Fri-ay, 19th of June, 2015 but not in the way most would think. A resident situate in the town of Grimsby, Ontario is arguing that the Municipality has no jurisdiction over his private property and that section 34 of the Planning Act is not applicable in regards to designations on his land to dictate any land use conditions. The Ontario Municipal Board, as well as the Divisional Court both ruled against him because neither were competent to hear his evidence when he presented his Crown Letters Patent.

This is the injustice!

This resident is using his letters patent to protect his property and his rights against out of control bureaucrats. This is not just for his rights, but for the rights of all Ontarians. The decisions by these lower tribunals should have been expected, but why would both wait until he had spent thousands, upon thousands of dollars before revealing that the level of court has no jurisdiction to hear cases which involve the Letters Patent, and involved the constitution and common law. This is the failure of the justice system, as they should have admitted their incompetency and allowed the resident to move forward without wasting his time and resources.

Based on the ruling, in the Divisional Court, it was stated that this level of court could not hear any evidence presented regarding the Letters Patent, in conjunction with the Constitution and Common Law, so what does this mean? Everyone who is using their letters patent can only find any form of common law rulings at the upper level of courts, meaning either the Superior Court of the province, or the Supreme Court of Canada. This also means that the lower courts are not capable of “common law” rulings.

This is a failure of the province, as the only law which is to be between the government and the people is the common law…that is part of our constitutional rights, so the question begs to be asked…why do we even have the lower courts? They should be removed if they are not competent to hear a case of common law content and there should be only the Superior Courts. There should be no Justices of the Peace, as it would seem they are a waste of time, and as for the Administrative Monetary Penalty being implemented in Ontario…this again is one of the largest violations of Ontarian’s constitutional rights, as it states in our Constitutional document that Canada is to have a constitution based on the principle of the constitution of Great Britain, therefore it states, in Magna Carta: 45. We will appoint as justices, constables, sheriffs, or bailiffs only such as know the law of the realm and mean to observe it well.

And what is the law of the realm, you may ask…According to the Abolition of the Star Chamber Court it is the Common Law of the Land.
Submission from Landowner Member

Confiscation of Rights

The improbable has happened! The improbable that the land patent the crown granted you when you, or those before you, acquired your property from the Crown spelling out your rights to your property has now come under the control of squalid bureaucrats.
On Friday the 19th day of June 2015 Superior Court Judge,  Dale Parayeski, sided with the town of Grimsby, Ontario giving that burg power to confiscate anyone’s private property rights for whatever purpose auspiciously for the common good and without compensation…

Through clever maneuvering, crafty legal trickery and suspected collusion, your almighty Crown Land Patent Grant has effectively been made subservient to Municipal rules, regulations and political whims! If the ‘Land Patent Grant’ truly was the be all and end all with regards to ‘Private Property Rights’ that would supersede and repel all attacks against ‘Private Property Owners!’

Question: How can any Court rule in favour of a municipality or an Ontario Municipal Board ruling knowing their is a superceding law, Crown Patent Grant, overriding such superfluous rulings?

This injustice is nothing short of 'Confiscation of Rights!'

This ‘precedent setting case’ leaves you with only one of two choices! You can live on your property as some kind of tenant at the pleasure of those who control it or you can join the effort to reinstate the supremacy of the Crown Land Patent Grant and right of your land.

There is an old saying that we can all hang together or we’ll all hang alone…

As an individual you can fight for your property rights at staggering costs or make the better choice, which is to pool a small fraction of your resources with other property owners to correct this obvious injustice.
VERIFICATION OF FACTS, PREVENTS CONFISCATION OF RIGHTS!

In response to SERIOUSLY FLAWED article named “LOWER COURTS NOT COMPETENT TO HEAR CROWN PATENT ARGUMENT”

I AM NOT FAMILIAR WITH THE WRITER WHO WROTE THIS ARTICLE, BUT IT IS QUITE OBVIOUS THE WRITER HIMSELF IS NOT COMPETENT IN THIS CASE.

Let me explain. I see the submission was from a Landowner Member, it figures.

The word is out, that if you have a lot of EXTRA  money to  hire a lawyer, then join the Landowners, as they recommend all the lawyers who help you win your case for you.

The injustice here, is the fact that the Landowners KNOW that the lower courts cannot hear a land patent grant case, but still inform their members to hire a lawyer and go to the lower courts to lose your money and your case!

Now that’s incompetence! Let’s face it, if you ask someone to kick you in the crotch and they do it, who is incompetent here, the kicker, or the kickee? The courts and the lawyers are the kickers, and you are the kickee. Again, who is incompetent?

When the writer spouts off about “our constitutional rights,” then I know FOR A FACT that the writer OF THAT ARTICLE is absolutely ignorant of ANY legal procedure or ANY  law!!

Please refer to my article titled: DEATH BY CORPORATION, OR DEATH OF CORPORATION, YOUR CHOICE for a clear explanation of what The Canada Act 1982, within it  containing schedule  “B” entitled The Constitution ACT of Canada” really is, and what it really means, and to whom it ACTUALLY APPLIES!.

Anyone who thinks that the constitution protects you if you do not work for the government, is extremely incompetent and certainly NOT learned in the law,  and to make such false, misleading  and fraudulent claims such as “we  have constitutional rights” to others, seems to be the norm for most (but not all)of the Landowner Groups.

If you listen, follow and put into practice the incorrect and sometimes false statements made by Landowner Members or Groups, you are almost GUARANTEED to lose your case, and your money! If you do not agree with what I say, then ask ANY Landowner Member or Group to show you documents of all the successes the Landowners have had in presenting their false arguments, to ANY level of ANY court, the proof is in the facts!

Whenever asked, the standard Landowners Members non-response is” the cases are out there”,, yeh,, where?, show me! prove it!, garlic to the vampire.

“Show me the facts so I can verify what you say” is the garlic to the Vampire, the silver bullet to the werewolf, is the shut-off switch to the Landowners unverifiable claims.

If I cannot verify what you say, then it does not exist, as in Blacks Maxims of law states” If you cannot name a thing, then all knowledge of that thing must cease to exist.” And I have yet to see any evidence of ANY private case win in court from a private person, using the so-called magic document called “The land Patent Grant” The evidence does not exist!

In the real world, if I cannot verify what you say, then it does not exist.

The Landowners Members claim some magic, ultimate and Imperial  authority of the Land Patent Grant documents, over anything else,, PROVE IT! Send me facts to verify, send me court cases to study, give me court decisions that I can  verify, send me Supreme court cases to study and verify.

I know that no such documents exist, because I have asked the Landowner Members I have contacted to send me such documents for many years now, and to this day, not one member has sent to me, a verifiable court case of ANY kind where this so-called magic document was used successfully by a private person,, NOT ONE!!!

If I cannot verify, then I seriously question the validity of all the un-verified claims of the Landowners groups.

I am always willing and ready to eat my words, apologize for being wrong, or correct my views,, but this change can only happen if I can verify the facts presented to me, in more than one way, that what you say, is correct, and what I say is incorrect.

If I cannot verify your claims and statements with verifiable  facts, then your statements are not true, and indeed, your claims are false.

I am calling out the Landowners Groups, after many years of asking you for verifiable facts on the statements you make and claim, it is now time to prove ME wrong.

SHOW ME THE VERIFIABLE DOCUMENTS AND VERIFIABLE  EVIDENCE OF YOUR CLAIMS AND STATEMENTS!

IF YOU DON’T LEARN AND EXERCISE YOUR RIGHTS, THEN YOU DON’T HAVE ANY

Canabilly



Question

If the highest law in the land says a property owner has property rights as dictated by a crown instrument known as the Land Patent Grant, then how and when did any lower law get to say otherwise?